One of the most notable areas of controversy in treating
mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is when to have
surgery. MR progresses slowly and certainly, and you want to either repair or
replace your valve before volume overload and increased pumping pressure
inflict permanent damage on your heart. On the other hand, surgery to correct
MR is a major procedure that has its own risks and complications. In addition,
the artificial valves used during valve replacements deteriorate over time, so
you may need additional surgeries in your life if you replace your valve. This
factor should be taken into account when deciding on the timing of
surgery.
The first disagreement centers on whether or not you should wait
until symptoms appear before undergoing surgery. Although it may seem logical
to repair or replace your valve only when you begin to feel that something is
wrong, MR may have damaged your heart permanently by the time symptoms present
themselves. Many clinical studies have been performed to evaluate this issue,
and most doctors have come to accept the general need to replace the valve
before symptoms are evident.
However, this may be balanced by factors such as advanced age and
overall health. For example, the older you are or the more compromised other
body functions may be, the riskier the prospect of open-heart surgery. You and
your doctor should discuss your specific circumstances when deciding on the
timing of valve repair or replacement.
The second disagreement centers on when you should have surgery. The
severity of your mitral regurgitation is measured by two main criteria: the
percentage of blood leaving your left ventricle with each pump (ejection fraction) and the size of your left ventricle at rest. Valve repair or
replacement is generally recommended when your
ejection fraction drops to less than 60% or when your
left ventricle is dilated to 45 mm at rest (diastole).1 This should be balanced against information about your
individual condition and overall health.