One of the most notable areas of controversy in treating
chronic
mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is when to have
surgery. Chronic MR progresses slowly and certainly, and you want to either
repair or replace your valve before volume overload and increased pumping
pressure do permanent damage to your heart. On the other hand, surgery to
correct MR is a major procedure that has its own risks and complications. In
addition, the artificial valves used during valve replacements deteriorate over
time, so you may need additional surgeries in your life if you replace your
valve. This should be taken into account when deciding on the timing of
surgery.
The first disagreement centers on whether or not you
should wait until symptoms appear before having surgery. Although it may seem
logical to repair or replace your valve only when you begin to feel that
something is wrong, MR may have damaged your heart permanently by the time
symptoms present themselves. Many clinical studies have been performed to
evaluate this issue, and most doctors have come to accept the general need to
replace the valve before symptoms are evident.
But this may be
balanced by factors such as advanced age and overall health. For example, the
older you are or the more compromised other body functions may be, the riskier
the prospect of open-heart surgery. You and your doctor should discuss your
specific circumstances when deciding on the timing of valve repair or
replacement.
The second disagreement centers on when you should
have surgery. The severity of your mitral regurgitation is measured by two main
criteria: the percentage of blood leaving your left ventricle with each pump
(ejection fraction) and the size of your left ventricle
at rest. Valve repair or replacement is generally recommended when your
ejection fraction drops to less than 60% and/or when your left ventricle is
dilated to 40 mm at rest (diastole).1 This should be
balanced against information about your individual condition and overall
health.